『海舌』　the Sea Tongue by Kaisetsu　

米国議会にクライメートゲート電子メール調査の動き。地球温暖化詐欺の終わりの始まり？【クライメートゲート】【Climategate】【地球温暖化詐欺】

....................................................


160 日出づる処の名無し sage ▼ 2009/11/26(木) 22:29:28 ID:BBifz5rc (2)
ttp://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100017954/us-congress-investigates-climategate-e-mails-this-could-be-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-agw/
US Congress investigates Climategate e-mails: this could be the beginning of the end for AGW
By Gerald Warner World Last updated: November 26th, 2009
米国議会はクライメートゲートの電子メールを調査する動きに、これはCo2総量規制の終わりの始まりになる可能性も
By Gerald Warner　英・テレグラフ（ブログ）　26日

＊クライメートゲートの、アメリカ政治に与える影響について書いていて、興味深いものが。

�（胴餡識，如▲�ライメートゲート事件の問題となる電子ネールの調査を始める動きが出ている
�∧胴饐絮，任癲�James Inhofe上院議員が調査を要求している
��政治的に問題になりそうなのは、オバマ政権の科学アドバイザーであるDr John Holdrenが、前職の
ウッズホール海洋研究所にいた2003年にペンシルバニア州立大学のMichael Mannと交換した電子
メールが含まれ、彼がMannを支持していること
�ず２麑簑蠅箸覆辰�East Anglia大学のCRUは、世界の気候変動データの最大規模のデータを蓄積し
ていることで評価され、米国EPAや国連IPCCはそのデータの解析に依存していた。それ故、今回のス
キャンダルはインパクトが大きい
�ケ儿颪�East Anglia大学のCRUの事件は前項の理由で、米国の政治に影響が大きく、オバマ政権の
環境規制法案（キャップ＆トレード、Co2総量規制と排出権取引の法案）の審議が済んでいない状況で
政治的に問題を抱える

209 日出づる処の名無し sage ▼ 2009/11/27(金) 00:13:59 ID:w5dO2ent
>>160　タイトルのAGWを総量規制と解釈したけれど、
これはanthropogenic global warming (人為的グローバル温暖化）
の略語の意味かもしれない。>>160のタイトルは取り下げて留保；





Gerald Warner
Gerald Warner is an author, broadcaster, columnist and polemical commentator who writes about politics, religion, history, culture and society in general.

US Congress investigates Climategate e-mails: this could be the beginning of the end for AGW
By Gerald Warner World Last updated: November 26th, 2009

The United States Congress has begun the process of investigating the leaked climate change e-mails from the University of East Anglia, which means all attempts to suppress and shut down the scandal have failed. Already aides to Representative Darrell Issa (Republican, California), who is the ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, have begun analysing the correspondence exposed by hackers.
At the same time, in the upper house, the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works has been told by Senator James Inhofe (Republican, Oklahoma) that unless it acts promptly on the matter he will call for an investigation into the state of climate science. The e-mails are of huge interest to American legislators because one of them was sent by White House Science Adviser Dr John Holdren, in 2003, when he was at the Woods Hole Research Center, Massachusetts, to support Michael Mann of Pennsylvania State University.
In his own e-mail, which he has defended and not denied, Mann suggested colleagues should be encouraged to stop submitting papers to the journal Climate Research, as it had published a paper to which he objected. The involvement of a White House adviser has given the controversy political traction on Capitol Hill, where legislators are considering the Obama administration’s plans for cap and trade laws, just when Obama has committed himself to restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions and personal attendance at the Copenhagen climate summit in a month’s time.
At this most sensitive moment the whole climate scare is threatening to unravel with literally immeasurable consequences. The seriousness with which the Americans are treating this has highlighted just how pivotal the CRU at East Anglia is to the global warming hype. As American newsmen are pointing out, East Anglia claims the world’s largest temperature data set and its findings and mathematical models were incorporated into the IPCC’s 2007 report, which the US Environmental Protection Agency admits it “relies on most heavily” in deciding that carbon dioxide emissions must be curbed.
Now these e-mails are being read on the CBS site, revealing a farcical Carry On Researching scenario at East Anglia: “Apply a very artificial correction for decline!!” “Low pass filtering at century and longer time scales never gets rid of the trend – so eventually I start to scale down the 120-yr low pass time series to mimic the effect of removing/adding longer time scales!” And so on. Codes were erratic, the baffled researchers had no idea what was going on.

...................................................................

この記事は次の関連記事です。⇒2009.11.29 Sunday
【極めて重要記事】【クライメートゲート】【Climategate】【地球温暖化詐欺】地球温暖化データにねつ造疑惑 [09/11/26]


クライメートゲート


地球温暖化詐欺

.....................................................................


Joe Public is now reading this stuff, courtesy of CBS, and wondering just what the heck has been happening. Republicans will be asking Obama’s people how the Environment Protection Agency came to rely on the CRU’s projections. They will also be asking questions about e-mails referring to grants from the US Commerce Department’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to East Anglia. One of them allegedly says: “We need to show some left to cover the costs of the trip Roger didn’t make and also the fees/equipment/computer money we haven’t spent otherwise NOAA will be suspicious.”
Unless and until that e-mail is authoritatively denied (and none of them so far appear to have been), many will conclude that those sentiments encapsulate the ethos of the climate alarmist industry. Contrast, too, the speed with which American legislators have concerned themselves with this scandal and the indifference of our own parliamentarians and mainstream media. America may not have Beefeaters, historic stately homes, or the Queen; but when our Transatlantic cousins suspect they have been shafted by a bunch of wide boys in white lab coats they do not hang around.
While the British public has heard only whingers from East Anglia shouting that hacking into e-mails is a crime, it is the American media that are pointing out that deleting e-mail messages to conceal them from a FOI request in the United Kingdom is also a criminal offence. Congress, seeing an opportunity of derailing Obama, Al Gore and an attempt to cripple America to the tune of countless billions of dollars, is on the case. This is global news now.
Meanwhile, the CBS News website is running the George Monbiot quote: “It’s no use pretending that this isn’t a major blow. The e-mails extracted by a hacker from the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia could scarcely be more damaging.” Too right.


............................................................................